I’ve been thinking a lot about creativity and what it means. Well, my shows are done for the year and I’m reading more, so that and increased coffee consumption over stimulate my brain sometimes. Anyway, during my last several field outings, I’ve felt especially good about the images I was making. So what was going on? I think it relates simply to two factors 1. a desire to express an emotional response to my surroundings (passion) and 2. enough knowledge of photography (my craft) both technically and aesthetically, to communicate it.
For that period of time outdoors, I was being creative. I was creating images that were expressive of the feelings I was experiencing and which had meaning to me. I wasn’t trying to be unique or different, just honest with myself about what was turning me on visually about my immediate environment. Ultimately, and this seems to jive with the reading I’ve done so far, the result of my creative activity is what distinguishes fine art from applied art.
Creativity it appears is all about problem solving. In photography the problems are visual and the goal is communication. When the problem is given to you by another, the art created is applied art. When the problem is self-imposed in order to express internal desires, that is considered fine art. Fine art isn’t necessarily more creative than applied art, just a different motivation.
*************************************************************






Recent Comments